Homosexual militants’ agenda being exposed

flag-1184117_1280.jpg

The public spat over redefining marriage is reaching a new level of absurdity with the homosexual activists now being exposed as the intolerant hypocrites they have always been.

Whilst demanding others conform to their agenda, they have regularly employed the tactics of totalitarianism whilst claiming to be the victims.

For years, those who support the view that marriage is between a man and a woman have been subject to abuse and slurs from the alphabet mafia. Anyone voicing their support for the status quo is derided as being a dinosaur, a homophobe or an intolerant bigot.

The hollow men and women of politics have joined in the chorus of abuse whilst demanding that a plebiscite to determine the matter would be rather nasty and could hurt some people’s feelings.

Strangely, the hypocrites define nastiness as saying anything that they disagree with. I acknowledge that there are, unfortunately, some people on the pro-traditional marriage side that spout vitriol but the homosexual marriage advocates often seem blind to the viciousness from their side.

We have already seen them use the publicly-funded tribunals to complain of those who have a different view. Recently they forced a hotel to cancel a meeting of those committed to protecting marriage because of concerns about the safety of staff.

A similar incident happened to me on a scheduled speaking engagement in Sydney some months ago. So aggressive were the activists, not only did the hotel cancel the booking but I was required to have police escorts to the rearranged function.

My electorate office signage has been repeatedly vandalised by the rainbow movement and my staff threatened and office trashed by queer theory protesters. Incredibly, one of these protesters was picked up from school by her parents and dropped at the violent demonstration because ‘it was a good cause’.

Social media is a cesspit of bullying and hate from the homosexual militants and their supporters. Any comment supporting marriage is responded to by a flood of angry social justice warriors claiming the moral high ground. Some are so captured by their own ego that they respond to almost any comment with a reference to their own sexual identity and their personal demands.

Their vitriol also extends to gay people who don’t agree with homosexual marriage, as evidenced by the abuse Josh Manuatu - a staffer of Senator Eric Abetz – has ensured for speaking his mind. Josh writes:

“I know of countless people in a similar position to me who are gay and conservative who think that the Safe Schools program is bad and that marriage should remain the same but who are too afraid to speak out for fear of being attacked by the PC lefty lynch mob.”

As I mentioned before, it is getting rather nasty but the responsibility for that lies on one side of the debate. Those protesting the most are the team responsible for the abuse.

Which brings me to ask: why are they so angry? Who really knows, but I suspect it has something to do with a dawning realisation that their true agenda is being exposed like never before.

So outrageous have the methodology and demands of this group become that they are alienating many who might otherwise support them. The politically-driven Safe Schools program, gender theory workshops for pre-schoolers and unisex toilets all alarm people of clear minds and good will.

The latest proposal debated in the Victorian Parliament was about allowing individuals to reclassify their own gender every twelve months and have it recorded on their birth certificate.

That’s right, this year you can be a female and next a male…and so on. It would certainly make sport a more interesting place. If gender is solely determined by the will of the individual then we could see men make the move to women’s sport. 

In fact we already have, with the South African runner Caster Semenya winning gold in the women’s 800m at the Rio Olympics. The fact that this woman has no womb, no ovaries, high testosterone, facial hair and a male sexual organs doesn’t seem to concern anyone. Little wonder ‘she’ beats the other women so easily.

So if the Victorian gender jumping proposal gets up who knows what other crossover sport enthusiasts we may see.

We are now truly reaching a level of absurdity that few would ever have anticipated but more are becoming aware of every single day. That’s the real reason the activists don’t want a plebiscite. They fear it will fail and if it does, make no mistake, it will be all their own doing.

Reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2016-10-24 18:11:46 +1030
    jay vass’ post is proof of their twisted ‘agenda’
  • commented 2016-10-04 18:12:11 +1030
    Conservatives DO NOT tell people how to live. Au Contraire — It is the LB… community of social thugs that are telling others that THEY have to change the norms of millennia, norms that made the west the advanced part of the world.

    Legally there is no difference, you merely want to hijack the WORD “marriage”.
    Here is the next step https://www.rt.com/news/355274-muslims-demand-polygamy-italy/
    After that, are animals and children safe? Certainly not in the “safe” schools child sexualisation and grooming program.

    Like it or not, Western Civilisation was primarily successful because of the fecundity and cooperation of heterosexual churchgoers. Maybe you guys even had heterosexual parents?
    Give thanks, though some of the LB… activists below prove it is not always a success.

    LB.. activists are deceitfully conflating straight people with everything else that they hate so they can knock their puerile strawman down. We just want freedom from harassment.

    LB.. activists are deceitfully conflating straight people with everything else that they hate so they can knock their puerile strawman down. We just want freedom from harassment.Just being straight is also to be PROUD OF. We don’t worship Pell as you deceitfully insist below.
    That we’re mostly not even religious gives the lie to all your sham claims below. Dump the hateful, hypocritical sham.

    LB.. activists are deceitfully conflating straight people with everything else that they hate so they can knock their puerile strawman down. We just want freedom from harassment.Just being straight is also to be PROUD OF. We don’t worship Pell as you deceitfully insist below.
    That we’re mostly not even religious gives the lie to all your sham claims below. Dump the hateful, hypocritical sham.Where is YOUR outrage at more than 270 million dead at the hands of the death cult now storming the middle east?
    Go on, make a feeble-minded attempt to convince us that this barbarism hasn’t been the NORM there for 1400 years?
    Try to impress me with your knowledge of its 800 incursions into the west before the paperwork was done and the west fought back – successfully. Or you could go, sprout you hatred there, test your life expectancy.

    LB.. activists are deceitfully conflating straight people with everything else that they hate so they can knock their puerile strawman down. We just want freedom from harassment.Just being straight is also to be PROUD OF. We don’t worship Pell as you deceitfully insist below.
    That we’re mostly not even religious gives the lie to all your sham claims below. Dump the hateful, hypocritical sham.Where is YOUR outrage at more than 270 million dead at the hands of the death cult now storming the middle east?
    Go on, make a feeble-minded attempt to convince us that this barbarism hasn’t been the NORM there for 1400 years?
    Try to impress me with your knowledge of its 800 incursions into the west before the paperwork was done and the west fought back – successfully. Or you could go, sprout you hatred there, test your life expectancy.
  • commented 2016-10-04 09:40:24 +1030
    Intolerant, homophobic clap trap. One thing that Conservatives and the far left have in common, is that they never tire of telling people how to live their lives. What business of yours is it if two people of the same sex decide to marry? How many people live in defacto relationships, have kids and are perfectly good parents? Once upon a time your kind shunned these relationships and even tried to deny basic social security benefits. How times have changed. Why aren’t you demanding that these sinners who live out of wedlock be brought into line?

    You Mr.Bernardi are allegedly a devout Catholic. You openly support a Church which has hidden and condoned the disgusting acts against children for over 70 years. Where is the outrage and condemnation? Where are your articles calling for reform and demanding justice? You call Islam intolerant, and yet you fail to look in your own backyard.This Church then has the audacity to tell people how to live their lives. How will God judge people like your revered George Pell?

    The Catholic Church are against birth control, and yet the population of the planet is out of control and unsustainable. Poor people who cannot feed themselves having more and more kids. That make perfect sense.Now you vehemently oppose Euthanasia. We both know that Euthanasia occurs on a daily basis all over the country, and it is committed by medical professionals who make the call.Why aren’t they arrested? If any person decides that they would prefer to end their life prematurely instead of being forced to die in unspeakable pain, what business it to you? Again you and your religious zealots want to control everything we do. If you expended the same energy in demanding change within your precious Church, you may have achieved something.
  • commented 2016-10-04 09:39:38 +1030
    Intolerant, homophobic clap trap. One thing that Conservatives and the far left have in common, is that they never tire of telling people how to live their lives. What business of yours is it if two people of the same sex decide to marry? How many people live in defacto relationships, have kids and are perfectly good parents? Once upon a time your kind shunned these relationships and even tried to deny basic social security benefits. How times have changed. Why aren’t you demanding that these sinners who live out of wedlock be brought into line?

    You Mr.Bernardi are allegedly a devout Catholic. You openly support a Church which has hidden and condoned the disgusting acts against children for over 70 years. Where is the outrage and condemnation? Where are your articles calling for reform and demanding justice? You call Islam intolerant, and yet you fail to look in your own backyard.This Church then has the audacity to tell people how to live their lives. How will God judge people like your revered George Pell?

    The Catholic Church are against birth control, and yet the population of the planet is out of control and unsustainable. Poor people who cannot feed themselves having more and more kids. That make perfect sense.Now you vehemently oppose Euthanasia. We both know that Euthanasia occurs on a daily basis all over the country, and it is committed by medical professionals who make the call.Why aren’t they arrested? If any person decides that they would prefer to end their life prematurely instead of being forced to die in unspeakable pain, what business it to you? Again you and your religious zealots want to control everything we do. If you expended the same energy in demanding change within your precious Church, you may have achieved something.
  • followed this page 2016-10-02 15:33:08 +1030
  • commented 2016-09-30 21:11:14 +0930
    Frank Key, I don’t like “same-sex marriage” because it isn’t at the heart of man-woman sexual union which can reproduce new-life (natural human reproduction). Are you suggesting that the government should encourage and promote all Australians into marrying their same-sex friend if marriage is changed to mean a legal same-sex consensual union (non-sexual) for all Australians? This means 2 people sign a piece of paper for marriage and can sign another piece of paper for divorce. The court only has to split the property equally between the couple because this type of marriage isn’t a man-woman sexual relationship and there are no biological children because same-sex couples can’t have them in this type of marriage. Christians and the Christian churches don’t have to get involved in this type of marriage because a legal consensual union are never mentioned in the Bible. I understand the reason you believe in this type of marriage because it only involves two consenting people and doesn’t have anything to do with natural human reproduction. At least Christians don’t have to attend these “sham marriages” because they’re a scientific experimentation in human reproduction by using abusive sexual activities. Wishing you the best, but I don’t agree with the Australian government creating a Humanist’s “Marriage equality” as a “sham marriage practice” for both same-sex and man-woman couples. You’re right that I don’t have to identify my “one flesh” union and my biological children with this "sham marriage practice even if the government makes it legal that doesn’t make it moral.
  • commented 2016-09-30 19:59:39 +0930
    Equality for everyone! If you don’t like same sex marriage don’t have a same sexy marriage! Very simple. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs but don’t force others not to be allowed to marry. It will happen it’s just a matter of when. FYI majority of Australians are for it anyway (not that should mater either as marriage is between the two people involved).
  • commented 2016-09-30 17:05:11 +0930
    The LBGT movement is literally tiny. However they voice their opinions louder than the majority saying things like “I’m triggered” and “I’m being oppressed” whenever someone says something they disagree with. “Same-sex marriage” Doesn’t even make any sense. Marriage is “The legally or formally recognized union of a man and a woman as partners in a relationship.” Marriage is so that a woman and a man can naturally create children or child. This makes me really confused when people want “Same-Sex marriage” to be a thing. Its like saying “same-sex-Woman and Man unified in a relationship-”. And the bit you said about changing your gender every year is bloody stupid. e.g If you are born male you are male forever. Most of these Swj’s (Social Justice Warriors) saying they are ‘Demi-queer’ and ‘Demi-boy" This makes me want to throw a Biology book at a group of them are either mentally ill or an attention seeker. To be completely honest most of them are most likely attention seekers. These people that “change their gender” including but not limited to Caitlyn Jenner. Who by the way he won the ’Woman of the year award’ that’s just really brainless. If you can ‘change your gender every year’, it’s highly likely that pedophiles will ‘change their gender’ and go into the woman’s (or man’s, you know anything happens) bathroom and molest and/or even rape. If the government lets you ‘change your gender’ (you can’t literally change your gender) every year it will be very foolish and brainless.
  • commented 2016-09-30 16:55:15 +0930
    Cory,
    Same-sex couples claim they have a “right to marry the other consenting adult that they love,” but why does the government need to provide a legal state marriage certificate for this consensual love? Will this legal state marriage certificate be used to purchase a scientific experiment of human reproduction – IVF/surrogacy? Will scientific experiments be made legal to explore male skin cells change into eggs to be fertilised with sperm? The government does need to protect and support natural human reproduction. Otherwise, humans will be treated like animals as scientific development in drugs, robotics, porn, human reproduction destroy respectful human sexual health and relationships . GM canola is not the same as canola, despite some people not caring about the difference, but there have been farmers whom have spent millions of dollars trying to protect their organic canola production from cross-pollination with GM canola. There are people whom want to protect natural human reproduction from the abusive sexual activities associated with homosexuality and gender theories. When body parts are used against their designed biological function then this is an abusive behavioural practice.

    Kati Jenkins hasn’t been given a legal right to marry (sexual union). Oral sexual activities and pretend sexual organs (a sexual organ with a non-sexual organ) have never been a criteria for marriage because these sexual activities can’t consummated a marriage which can reproduce new-life (natural human reproduction). Kati would like marriage to mean a legal state marriage certificate because she believes a piece of paper from the government makes a marriage loving, healthy, life-long, respectful and faithful. However, I have been married for 18 1/2 years which has reproduced 3 biological children. The government has never made me purchase our NSW marriage certificate and we would only need it to have a divorce so this isn’t a loving document. Our marriage is recorded in a church, family history books, Family Bible and a church marriage certificate (no state number), but I have changed my name on all official documents. The NSW Marriage Registry was only established in 1857 to protect and support the religious practice of marriage by keeping accurate records for the illegitimacy of children and inheritance. The history of marriages in NSW were only recorded in the Church of England and other denominations from 1788-1856. Was there a reason there were no same-sex marriages during this period of time when the government wasn’t involved in the practice of marriage?

    Sodomy was no longer made as a criminal offence against nature for harm minimisation reasons. Are same-sex couples trying to change marriage for the purpose of harm minimisation to reduce the high-risk of LGBTIAQ from suicide? I would withhold the Australian government giving husbands a legal right to practice sodomy with their wife because of the serious health and relationship problems including drug-resistant STDs, faecal incontinence, green vaginal discharge which causes pelvic inflammatory disease leading to infertility, anal cancer, anal fistulas – requiring anal repairs.

    Same-sex couples are changing marriage for everyone because it means marriage isn’t the man-woman sexual union which can create new-life (natural human reproduction) and this is a “delusional fantasy.” Same-sex couples are experiencing a “delusional fantasy” when they believe “love is love” which means they believe sexual activities (a sexual organ and a non-sexual organ – anal and oral sexual activities, masturbation – hand sex, pornography – mind sex, pretend sexual organs, robotic sex toys/dolls, chem (drug) sex) are the same as sexual intercourse – “one flesh” union to consummate a marriage which can reproduce new-life. Same-sex couples are experiencing a “delusional fantasy” when they believe their children don’t experience or suffer any harm, hurt and pain by being legally separated from their biological parent/s, despite all the scientific reports on the “stolen generation,” forced adoption, IVF/surrogacy – anonymous egg/sperm donation, children orphanages, children separated via divorce, adoption, single parent, and blended/step families. There is no Australian or religious law requiring couples to have a legal consensual marriage. The High Court of Australia never defined a legal consensual marriage or its purpose. Therefore, Christians can refuse to identify their marriage with a “sham marriage practice” if this is made legal by the Australian government. Christians can identify their marriage with the original meaning of marriage called “one flesh” union which doesn’t need a legal state marriage certificate or a ceremony in a church because this has existed since the beginning of time. My German forefathers didn’t have a legal state marriage certificate and refused to get married in the King’s state church.

    Kati, you may believe I am mean spirited, but there are a number of people whom are experiencing “delusional fantasies” including an Asian woman whom got her friend to cut-off her arm and foot so she could be disabled to claim insurance. There are people whom believe that health professionals should cut-off their penis and have hormone replacement, and they want to change their birth certificate and marriage certificate, despite there being no evidence of a transgender, bisexual, homosexual or heterosexual gene. There are people whom believe in Dr Google, their feelings and natural therapies and will refuse to have life-saving medical treatment for themselves or their child. There are children whom believe they’re a bird and want to jump of a roof so they can fly. The Age recently reported of a young man who believed his father was the devil so he killed him. There are people whom believe they should get government, University, bathroom and other benefits because they same-sex attracted or transgender. Which people do we believe are telling us the truth? When their desires, feelings, lusts and passions aren’t based on scientific truth/reality the government needs to protect and support all people from harm.

    Kati, my daughter has a friend who looked everywhere at home for her father, but couldn’t find him. One of her mums told my daughter that her father comes around when she is at swimming lessons. I want to protect future children from experiencing a legal loss of a mother/father. Children’s legal right to their biological mother and father are more important than your right to a consensual relationship which doesn’t need to be legal. The Marriage Act is a law which legally binds children with their biological parents. Best wishes, even though I totally disagree with you regarding same-sex marriage. The silent majority need to defend natural human reproduction as we refuse scientific experimentation of human reproduction. Infertile man-woman couples can get married because they meet the criteria of marriage by having the sexual organs of man-woman which can consummate a marriage. However, a same-sex couples doesn’t meet the criteria of marriage because they don’t have the man-woman sexual organs to consummate a marriage. If you want marriage to mean only a legal consensual union, then I don’t need to identify my marriage with this “sham marriage” as this a status of marriage with no meaning or purpose for natural human reproduction.
  • commented 2016-09-30 16:24:27 +0930
    The LBGT movement is literally tiny. However they voice their opinions louder than the majority saying things like “I’m triggered” and “I’m being oppressed” whenever someone says something they disagree with. “Same-sex marriage” Doesn’t even make any sense. "The legally or formally recognized union of a man and a woman as partners in a relationship.
  • commented 2016-09-30 10:38:29 +0930
    “Anyone voicing their support for the status quo is derided as being a dinosaur, a homophobe or an intolerant bigot.”

    No Cory, those terms are only reserved for those who proudly proclaim that they would withhold the right for any consenting adult to marry the other consenting adult that they love. Why would anyone withhold that right, it’s quite mean spirited and that’s it.
  • commented 2016-09-30 10:02:51 +0930
    Hi Cory,
    You ask “Why are they so angry, who knows..”. I reckon that’s a good question. Perhaps seeking to understand before being understood could be a way forward. I’ve always found having a deep understanding before forming opinion to a an important expression of my faith. Take care.
  • commented 2016-09-30 09:33:37 +0930
    Hi Cory, It sure is a slippery slope the rainbow sjw’s are pushing down!
    There sure seems to be a lot of time and effort spent in parliament pushing the gay agenda. Surely the Australian Government has more important issues than gay marriage. I would suggest there is a conflict of interest for mp’s and senators who want to change laws to benefit themselves, e.g.; if the politicians are gay and they are spending a lot of tax payers time and money on trying to get same sex marriage passed and it in turn benefiting themselves, then there lies the conflict of interest?
  • commented 2016-09-29 23:08:37 +0930
    When discussing the inanity of the lbgtxyz movement, my mind goes to their claim “born that way” and the attempt to coerce all Australians through indoctrination of the very young (Unsafe Schools) that they may be “born that way”. If they are “born that way”, then the logical conclusion is, they will become extinct as they cannot procreate. I assume they have no problem with their advance to die out in one generation. Maybe they haven’t thought this through as they seem to want to take over the world. They have no problem with buying a created being, although they must have to close their hearts to how that human being is created as it can only be created by a creator. It couldn’t be more simply and powerfully said in Genesis as to how that comes about, but then they probably haven’t read the Holy Bible. Maybe their frustration and unhappiness with life (as evidenced by the vitriol and hate – even for their own) is because they have subconsciously denied themselves the joy of God’s heterosexual procreative act. It must be frustrating as a strong personal discipline in life is necessary to achieve that joy. There is no debate or discussion on the lgbtxyz problem as it’s impossible to have a logical conversation with an illogical mind/s so it cannot be debated. Unfortunately for Australia, Bill Shorten, a possible future Prime Minister of Australia, is a classic example of the illogical mind which will not listen, will not acknowledge the point of opposing view, and does not want to as evidenced by his responses in the media on the subject of anything to do with marriage, gay or not. Thank you Cory Bernardi for taking a strong and common sense stand on these matters. It is so appreciated.
  • commented 2016-09-29 21:11:30 +0930
    Oft times we need the wisdom of men and women who lived beyond our time. St. Anthony the Great once said; “A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.’” Likewise, the same-sex marriage debate is not a debate. It is instead this very same madness of which Saint Anthony wrote; an Orwellian hammer used to bludgeon all sane discourse and free thought. Bill Shorten should be ashamed of himself for calling anyone who doesn’t agree with same-sex marriage as ‘knuckle draggers’. This ‘leader’ cynically and despicably condemns millions of Australians to this standard for simply opposing same-sex marriage. We have arrived at the bottom of the barrel. The lunacy that is the same-sex marriage ‘debate’ is bound inexorably together with Green dogma that suggests the blame for South Australia’s unprecedented blackout is a result of climate change. What hubris! Not long ago, South Australians were promised lower electricity prices and a ‘gold-standard’ power grid. Wind-farms were the new nirvana. We now pay the highest power prices in the world (with record disconnection in SA due to the working class’ inability to pay their electricity bills) only to be told to suck it up by the Greens – mostly sitting MP’s with generous salaries who no doubt claim on their electricity bills! Someone’s taking crazy pills! But seriously, tyranny and the barbarians are at the gate. Time to stop the lunacy, Cory. Holes keep springing up in the dyke of this truly great nation, and we are very quickly running out of fingers and toes.
  • commented 2016-09-29 19:06:59 +0930
    Right on Cory.
  • commented 2016-09-29 18:27:19 +0930
    The referendum would fail and this could cause some division in the community bringing this whole issue to a head. The sad thing with some of those who choose this type of lifestyle is they can get quite antagonistic towards those who don’t agree with their stance (as you have pointed out). Hidden agendas also surface in time, as issues of morality clash. Those who believe this lifestyle is anti social also realize that influencing the young towards immorality can be a dangerous thing for society as a whole. The LGBT+ lobby use the logic of two wrongs can make a right, when they use the excuse of ‘gay bashing’ to justify introducing sexual alternatives in the education system, especially to those children who are nowhere near the puberty phase of their lives or able to comprehend the concepts involved.
  • commented 2016-09-29 17:37:37 +0930
    Couldn’t agree more Cori.
  • commented 2016-09-29 16:06:51 +0930
    It’s all about cultural Marxism, political correctness, totalitarianism and an anti-family agenda all dressed up as “love and equality”. For mine, It is not about love or equal rights. No-one has a right to anything from a total society point of view so from the perspective that this issue would have a fundamental affect on so much of society, I am glad that we are having a plebiscite on it, regardless of the financial cost to taxpayers or the obligation on politicians to follow through on the result. That said, I would expect that elected representatives of the people would recognise the views of the people and legislate if required on the basis of the plebiscites result.
    In most secular societies where same sex couples exist and are acknowledged, they do have the same rights as heterosexual couples. Be it the right to acknowledge and celebrate their relationships, the right to structure their financial arrangements in a way that respects the strength of their relationships, the right to have children and the right to acknowledge their family unit, both publicly and privately whenever and however they choose. This whole issue really is about public recognition, legislative acknowledgement and personal justification and even legitimacy for some people in society who believe they are an unfairly treated minority group.
  • commented 2016-09-28 20:22:17 +0930
    The LGBTIAQ lobby-dictators believe marriage isn’t a man-woman sexual union which can create new-life (natural human reproduction). “Same-sex marriage” makes a legal state marriage certificate the evidence of a marriage between any 2 people. Same-sex couples can’t have an exclusive sexual relationship as husband and wife to reproduce new-life (natural human reproduction). Is the Australian government promoting a non-exclusive sexual relationship between a husband and wife? There’s plenty of evidence overseas that western governments have opened marriage to other sexual relationships with significant harmful health and relationship problems.